It's all just movement.įor example, after the action moves to the druglord's mansion in Cuba, the heroes commandeer his bright yellow Hummer for a getaway under fire. The chase scenes and shoot-outs are broken down into closeups that deny us any sense of the physical relationship of the actors or the strategy of a chase.
In a movie that is painfully long at 146 minutes, why is this scene taking up our time? The movie is so choppy in its nervous editing that a lot of the time we're simply watching senseless kinetic action. As nearly as I can tell, the only reason this scene is in the movie is so that we can watch two helicopters chasing a speedboat. Eventually the cops spray the boat with automatic weapons, the engine dies, and we hear "the boat is dead in the water." End of scene. Maybe I missed something, but it didn't make much difference. I was never sure who was in the speedboat, or why it was fleeing. Consider a sequence in which two helicopters pursue a speedboat near Miami. Do these images need to be given fresh circulation in 2003? The movie has a carelessness that shows a contempt for the audience. Occasionally there is variety, as when the boys shoot up a Ku Klux Klan rally I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I don't see anything funny about burning crosses and guys in hoods. No one in the movie is very interesting our eyes glaze over during yet another bone-tired retread of chase scenes that we have seen over and over again. Joe Pantoliano is the obligatory police captain who constantly chews out the guys (and for once, a movie takes notice of the body count after a chase scene). Gabrielle Union plays Lawrence's sister, a DEA agent from New York who has been seeing Smith. Even the villain is a bargain-basement ripoff of Al Pacino's great drug dealer in " Scarface." The plot, briefly, involves Smith and Lawrence as partners on the trail of a drug supplier who moves his money into Cuba. Michael Bay, the director, is a master of this sort of thing, and his screenplay was labored over by at least four writers, although there is not an original idea in it.
Oh, it's all done with competent technique. What were they thinking? Have they so lost touch with human nature that they think audiences will like this scene? Do they think it's funny? Did the actors voice any objections? It's the job of the producer to keep a film on track did Jerry Bruckheimer notice anything distasteful? Or is it possible that everyone connected with the film has become so desensitized by the relentless cynical aggression of movies like this that the scene passed without comment? "Bad Boys II" is a bloated, unpleasant assembly-line extrusion in which there are a lot of chases and a lot of killings and explosions. The needless cruelty of this scene took me out of the movie and into the minds of its makers.